It’s been almost a week since the 2012 Formula 1 season came
to a climax in Brazil
and the bitter taste of defeat is finally starting to fade away. For those of
you who didn’t watch last Sunday’s (or if you live in Australia , Monday morning’s)
dramatic conclusion, Fernando Alonso lost the Driver’s Championship by a mere
three points to Sebastian Vettel. It was an exciting race and Ferrari fought
until the very last lap but sadly, despite Vettel having to endure what has to
be one of the most calamitous races of his career, he would not be denied the
championship.
My initial reaction to what has been nicknamed “Flag-Gate”
was one of horror. There is nothing worse than when the result of a race is
altered after the cars have reached the chequered flag and the champagne has
been sprayed. The idea that the Championship could be decided by a post-race
penalty made my stomach turn. I imagined the potential headlines accusing
Ferrari of using underhanded tactics and various other odious methods in order
to secure the Championship. I imagined that somehow, even if the argument was
completely valid, Ferrari’s image would once again be dragged through the mud
and others would emerge looking whiter than white.
My mind skipped back to Texas , when Ferrari made the bold decision
to break the seal on Felipe Massa’s gearbox, demoting the Brazilian five
positions on the grid. It was a strategic move that allowed Fernando Alonso to
start on the clean side of the track and helped to ensure that Ferrari would
take the Championship down to the wire.
From inside the paddock, there were no complaints about this
strategy. In fact, I rather think that many of the teams might have admired its
brilliance. Still, despite there being no controversy, some members of the
media chose to report it as one. One article that boiled my blood in particular
appeared on ESPN’s Formula 1 website. In the article Martin Williamson accused the
strategy of being within the rules but outside the spirit of them. He even went
as far as to say that Ferrari’s actions made a mockery out of qualifying and sullied
the sport. It is commentary like this that gives new fans a false impression of
the sport. What exactly did Williamson mean when he spoke of the spirit of the
sport and what made him believe that he could even attempt to define the moral
boundaries of a sport that is three dimensional, not black and white. Team
orders have always had a place within Formula 1 and the teams have always
pushed the limits of the regulations. It is the media who chooses to make drama
where indeed no drama exists.
The media has this amazing ability to blow things totally
out of proportion and paint its subjects as either heroes or villains. Sensational
headlines sell newspapers and everyone enjoys commenting on a good controversy.
As much as I would have loved to celebrate a Ferrari Championship, I must
concede that this whole messy post-Brazil affair has been nothing more than the
Spanish media stirring the pot.
Although Ferrari were satisfied that Vettel overtook
Kobayashi under a yellow and red striped flag during the Brazilian Grand Prix,
the emergence of the Vettel/Vergne video on the internet and the media storm
that the video unleashed, forced them to re-examine the race and ask for
clarification from the FIA. Fernando Alonso, himself was allegedly also amongst
those calling for Ferrari to lodge a protest. “I have no miracles.” He wrote on
this twitter account “I transform the correct rules in my miracles.” with his
manager, Luis Garcia Abad adding “Where justice does not prevail, it’s
dangerous to be in the right.”
In the conspiracy theorists’ defence, I have to admit that I
have watched the grainy video of Vettel’s pass on Vergne countless times and
have yet to see a green flag being waved. Still, the quality of the video that
sparked this debate is so poor that one cannot even read Vettel’s dashboard. As
much as I dislike not being able to see the flag with my own eyes, I do accept
that both the FIA and the teams have access to a quantity of information that
would make my head spin.
In the end, the whole dramatic episode amounted to nothing,
with the FIA confirming that Vettel’s move was indeed legal and that Ferrari
had no case to appeal. Ferrari too conceded, issuing the following statement:
“Ferrari duly takes note of the reply sent by the FIA this morning and
therefore considers the matter now closed. The request for a clarification from
the FIA, regarding Vettel’s passing move on Vergne, came about through the need
to shed light on the circumstances of the move, which came out on the internet
only a few days after the race.”
With Vettel in the clear, the media has made Ferrari its
latest target, with some unfair comments being hurled in the team’s direction
questioning the Italian side’s sportsmanship. Perhaps to clear the air a
little, Stefano Domenicali made a statement of his own. “We had no intention of
belittling the merit of the title winner, but it was right to have the matter
completely cleared up.”
Believe what you like, but the fact remains that in the face
of overwhelming pressure, Ferrari had no choice but to address the issue. The
team’s ethics and sportsmanship have nothing to do with it. Were the situations
reversed, Red Bull might have very well reacted in a similar manner and yet,
somehow, I have a feeling that they wouldn’t have received quite the same
amount of criticism for merely asking for clarification. The lesson here is
that it is the media we should hold accountable for sensationalising issues in
order to sell papers and not the teams who are merely trying to do their jobs
to the best of their abilities.
I liked your secret mission to Monza track
ReplyDeleteI hope you can do same with the bench seat that Enzo use to sit on post race at Valentino Park in Turin
Your the person for this job!
When will u move back to Italy?
Hi, ANOTHER job for you! :-)
ReplyDeleteNeed to ditch Smelbourne and head on back home to Italy:
http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gsr&GScid=2232360